Author:
Jerolleman Alessandra,Marino Elizabeth,Jessee Nathan,Koslov Liz,Comardelle Chantel,Villarreal Melissa,de Vries Daniel,Manda Simon
Abstract
AbstractBased on the relationships and work that have informed this book, it has become apparent to us that we ought to dedicate the last chapter to what we believe relocation scholars should know about how bureaucratic discretion works in conjunction with the law. Initially, we intended the latter part of this book to be a kind of a primer on laws, legal concepts, and legal tools that framed relocation. This was done in part so that relocation scholars and practitioners who have not had legal training could have a technical short course on some concepts; and to put legal constructs in conversation with the critical social sciences and critical social theory.
Funder
National Science Foundation
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference23 articles.
1. Arnstein, S. R. (1972). Maximum feasible manipulation. Public Administration Review, 32, 377–390.
2. Baurick, T. (2022, August 28). The last days of Isle de Jean Charles: A Louisiana tribe’s struggle to escape the rising sea. Times Picayune. https://www.nola.com/news/environment/article_70ac1746-1f22-11ed-bc68-3bde459eba68.html
3. Bob Hudson, David Hunter & Stephen Peckham. (2018). Policy failure and the policy-implementation gap: can policy support programs help? Policy Design and Practice, 2(1), 1-14.
4. Congressional Research Service. (2021). Agency Use of Guidance Documents. Report LSB10591
5. Downton, M. W., & Pielke, R. A., Jr. (2001). Discretion without accountability: Politics, flood damage, and climate. Natural Hazards Review, 2(4), 157–166.