Abstract
AbstractImagine a group of philosophy students, about to complete a Master’s program in continental philosophy, who are invited to visit a life sciences research laboratory, somewhere on a university campus. Having studied some of Heidegger’s quintessential works, such as Being and Time and The Question of Technology, they suddenly find themselves exposed to racks of test-tubes and automated sequencing machines. Suppose that, thrown into such an “unworldly” lab environment, they ask themselves how to interpret their experiences in a Heideggerian manner.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference60 articles.
1. Babich, B. (2018). Between Heidegger and Adorno: Airplanes, radios, and Sloterdijks’ atmoterrorism. Kronos: Philosophical Journal, 6, 133–158.
2. Blok, V. (2013). Towards the rehabilitation of the will in contemporary philosophy. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 44(3), 286–301.
3. Blok, V. (2015). Heidegger and Derrida on the nature of questioning: Towards the rehabilitation of questioning in contemporary philosophy. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 46(4), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2015.1052659
4. Blok, V. (2020). Heidegger’s concept of philosophical method: Innovating philosophy in the age of global warming. Routledge.
5. Dahlstrom, D. (1994). Heidegger’s method: Philosophical concepts as formal indications. The Review of Metaphysics, 47(4), 775–795.