Abstract
AbstractThe political landscape of Central Asia experienced a profound and irreversible transformation following the dissolution of the Soviet Union. While common trends, such as shifting from planned to market economies and attempts at democratisation, were observed, the distinctive context of each Central Asian state played a unique role in shaping their individual transitions. This process has been further accelerated since the early 2000s with the increasing presence and influence of various actors, including states, multinational companies, and nongovernment and international organisations, across the region. Within this evolving landscape, international organisations have emerged as norm entrepreneurs, playing significant roles in diffusing norms within Central Asia. Whilst actively involved in the region, UNODC’s specific activities, projects, and mechanisms via which it disseminates norms on issues within its mandate in Central Asia remain unexplored. This chapter addresses this gap and seeks to answer the following questions: How does UNODC foster international norms and standards in response to transnational challenges? Why is UNODC’s involvement crucial in facilitating norm diffusion within Central Asia? This study also addresses potential contestation from the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) against UNODC’s norm diffusion and reflects upon evolving global governance dynamics and the boundaries of norm diffusion in the Central Asian region.
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Reference72 articles.
1. Acharya, A. (2004). How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization, 58(2), 239–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818304582024
2. Alderson, K. (2001). Making sense of state socialization. Review of International Studies, 27(3), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210501004156
3. Ambrosio, T. (2008). Catching the ‘Shanghai spirit’: How the Shanghai Cooperation Organization promotes authoritarian norms in Central Asia. Europe-Asia Studies, 60(8), 1321–1344. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130802292143
4. Ambrosio, T. (2016). The legal framework of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization: An architecture of authoritarianism. The Foreign Policy Centre. Retrieved 8 August 2023, from https://fpc.org.uk/sco-architecture-of-authoritarianism/
5. Barnes, J. F., Carter, M., & Skidmore, M. J. (1980). The world of politics: A concise introduction. Martin’s Press.