Abstract
AbstractThe focus of this chapter is on global social policy actors and their ideas on health care systems. The specific position and constellation of key IOs are illustrated by a mapping and characterization of four central IOs (WHO, World Bank, ILO, OECD). The main ideas on health care systems of these four IOs are presented in relation to each other, taking into account discourses between them. That is then taken further to characterize the global health governance architecture based on contestational and collaborative relationships between IOs. Based on that, the chapter discusses the (preliminary) implications of the COVID-19 pandemic for altering that architecture.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference48 articles.
1. Barroy, Hélène, Ding Wang, Claudia Pescetto, and Joseph Kutzin. 2020. How to Budget for COVID-19 Response? A Rapid Scan of Budgetary Mechanisms in Highly Affected Countries. Geneva: WHO.
2. Bedoya, Guadalupe, and Amy Dolinger. 2020. Supporting Vulnerable Health Systems Improve Infection Prevention and Control to Fight the COVID-19 Pandemic. Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
3. Béland, Daniel, and Mitchell A. Orenstein. 2013. “International Organizations as Policy Actors: An Ideational Approach.” Global Social Policy 13 (2): 125–143.
4. Birn, Anne-Emanuelle, Laura Nervi, and Eduardo Siqueira. 2016. “Neoliberalism Redux: The Global Health Policy Agenda and the Politics of Cooptation in Latin America and Beyond.” Development and Change 47 (4): 734–759. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12247.
5. Colombo, Francesca. 2020. “Resilient Health Systems: What we are learning from the COVID-19 crisis.” The Forum Network, 21 May 2020. https://www.oecd-forum.org/users/382555-francesca-colombo/posts/64973-resilient-health-systems-what-we-are-learning-from-the-covid-19-crisis.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献