Abstract
AbstractThe chapter on international organizations (IOs) and the global social governance of pensions analyzes the way in which IOs have competed to shape the pensions discourse. It shows how the organizational field has been shaped by the dominant economic paradigm, which has created space for IOs to operate in the policy area. A paradigmatic change creates the environmental conditions for new IOs to enter the field and compete or cooperate with the existing IOs to shape the discourse. The intrinsic features of each IO operating in the pension reform arena will be shown to determine their approach to influencing the pensions discourse and how they respond to rivals entering the field.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference54 articles.
1. Appel, Hilary, and Mitchell A. Orenstein. 2013. “Ideas Versus Resources Explaining the Flat Tax and Pension Privatization Revolutions in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union.” Comparative Political Studies 46 (2): 123–152.
2. Büchi, Hernán. 2006. “How Chile Successfully Transformed Its Economy.” The Heritage Foundation. September 18. https://www.heritage.org/international-economies/report/how-chile-successfully-transformed-its-economy. Accessed February 2019.
3. Barnett, Michael, and Martha Finnemore. 2004. Rules for the World. New York: Cornell University Press.
4. Barr, Nicholas. 1994. Labor Markets and Social Policy in Central and Eastern Europe: The Transition and Beyond. Washington, DC: World Bank.
5. Barr, Nicholas. 2001. The Welfare State as Piggy Bank. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献