Allyship Masculinities in the Unjust Meantime-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Allyship Masculinities in the Unjust Meantime

Published:2022 Issue: Volume: Page:83-107
ISSN:
Container-title:Nontoxic: Masculinity, Allyship, and Feminist Philosophy
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Almassi Ben

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter explores the intersectional potential of and challenges for feminist allyship masculinities in social context. What does it mean for allyship masculinities to be open to all men, not in spite but because of the diversity of social locations and experiences among us? We take up epistemological challenges for allyship masculinity including active ignorance, epistemic injustice, and situated knowledge, before turning to social, political, and ethical challenges, with particular attention to issues of accountability and male privilege put toward feminist ends within patriarchal systems.

Funder

Ben Almassi

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-031-13071-7_6

Reference71 articles.

1. Alcoff, Linda. 2007. Epistemologies of Ignorance: Three Types. In Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance, ed. Shannon Sullivan and Nancy Tuana, 39–58. Albany: SUNY Press.

2. Applebaum, Barbara. 2020. Racial Battle Fatigue, Epistemic Exploitation, and Willful Ignorance. Philosophy of Education 76 (4): 60–77.

3. Atherton-Zeman, Ben. 2011. We Can Do Better: ‘Power and Control’ and ‘Accountability’ Wheels for Male Aspiring Allies. The Voice: The Journal of the Battered Women’s Movement: 32–33.

4. Bailey, Alison. 1999. Despising an Identity They Taught Me to Claim. In Whiteness: Feminist Philosophical Narratives, ed. Chris Cuomo and Kim Q. Hall, 85–107. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

5. Berenstain, Nora. 2016. Epistemic Exploitation. Ergo 33 (2): 569–590.