Abstract
AbstractDetermining the goals and purpose of the medical profession has long been a topic of debate among physicians and scholars alike. If medicine is a practice, then it is necessary to define the aim of the practitioner’s actions. Regardless of the differing perspectives, there is consensus that the promotion and preservation of individual health and well-being is a primary component of medicine. However, an exploration of the medical community’s active participation in the systematic labeling, persecution, forced sterilization, experimentation and eventual mass murder of millions of people deemed inferior or unfit during the Holocaust reveals decidedly different goals. Examining the process by which healers became killers provides an opportunity to hold the profession accountable, take stock of the moral vulnerabilities of physicians and use these lessons to create a post-Holocaust moral ethos that values rehumanization and human dignity.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference32 articles.
1. Adorno, R. 2009. Human dignity and human rights as a common ground for a global bioethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34: 223–240.
2. Annas, G. 2010. The legacy of the nuremberg doctors’ trial to American bioethics and human rights. In Medicine after the Holocaust: From the master race to the human genome and beyond, ed. S. Rubenfeld, 93–105. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
3. Breggin, P.R. 1993. Psychiatry’s role in the Holocaust. International Journal of Risk and Safety in Medicine 4: 133–148.
4. Bruns, F. 2014. Turning away from the individual: Medicine and morality under the Nazis. In Nazi ideology and ethic, ed. W. Bialas and L. Fritz, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
5. Bruns, F., and T. Chelouche. 2017. Lectures on inhumanity: Teaching medical ethics in German medical schools under Nazism. Annals of Internal Medicine 166 (8): 591–595.