Godwin’s Law and the Limits of Bioethics and Holocaust Studies

Author:

Bedzow Ira

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter examines the ways in which Godwin’s Law disallows good bioethical discussion on controversial topics in healthcare because of the ways in which it invokes improper Holocaust analogies. However, rather than concluding that contemporary bioethics never use the Holocaust as a point of reference, the chapter suggests productive ways that lessons of the Holocaust can inform moral deliberation in bioethics.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference15 articles.

1. Baker, Robert. 2013.  Before bioethics: A history of American medical ethics from the colonial period to the bioethics revolution. Oxford University Press.

2. Beauchamp, Tom L. 1990. Promise of the beneficence model for medical ethics. J. Contemp. Health L. & Pol'y 6: 145.

3. Binding, Karl, and Alfred Hoche. 2012. Allowing the destruction of life unworthy of life: Its measure and form. Suzeteo Enterprises.

4. Caleb, Amanda M., and Stacy Gallin. 2021. Policies of exclusion: The impact of COVID-19 on people with disabilities. Saint Louis University Journal of Health Law & Policy 14 (2): 7.

5. Chivers, Tom. 2009. Internet rules and laws: the top 10, from Godwin to Poe. The Daily Telegraph (London), October 23, 2009.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3