Tipping Points. Deep Roots and Contemporary Challenges in Psychology

Author:

Sarrica Mauro,Cottone Paolo,Biddau Fulvio

Abstract

AbstractAs an object of study, tipping points raise several questions for psychology. Unless one wants to use this term as a generic metaphor to indicate sudden change, any attempt to better define this concept has to take into account some fundamental psychological features including acceptance, promotion or resistance to change, the relationship between quantitative and qualitative transformations, the dynamics between individual, social and societal levels, and the relationship between psychological and environmental changes. All these facets refer to classical approaches and theorisations developed in the early 1900s as well as to more recent systemic models, including societal and cultural psychology approaches and proposals for a socio-ecological psychology. In this chapter, we will identify points of contact with classics such as Insights and Dynamics of field forces, Cognitive dissonance, Grievance, Bounded rationality, Coping, and Socio-dynamical approaches to social representations. Moreover, looking at the recent literature, we will highlight advances in our understanding of tipping points provided by cognitive, socioecological and systemic models. Common to all these views is the attempt to describe and explain the processes that favour or hinder qualitative transformation, both in terms of its perception and its enactment. In this chapter, we will provide an overview of the different approaches mentioned, which should be read more as an agenda for future research rather than an exhaustive review of state of the art.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference47 articles.

1. Amari, G., Leone, G., & Marraffa, A. (2016). In G. Amari, G. Leone, & A. Marraffa (Eds.), Ce lo chiede l’Europa ? Le parole giornalistiche per discutere di Fiscal Compact. Ediesse.

2. Axia, G. (2006). Emergenza e psicologia. Il Mulino.

3. Brondi, S., Armenti, A., Cottone, P., Mazzara, B. M., & Sarrica, M. (2014). Parliamentary and press discourses on sustainable energy in Italy: No more hard paths, not yet soft paths. Energy Research & Social Science, 2, 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.04.011

4. Brondi, S., Sarrica, M., Caramis, A., Piccolo, C., & Mazzara, B. M. (2016). Italian parliamentary debates on energy sustainability: How argumentative ‘short-circuits’ affect public engagement. Public Understanding of Science, 25(6), 737–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515580067

5. Caillaud, S. (2016). Social representations theory: A dialogical approach to the ecological crisis. Papers on Social Representations, 25(1), 6.1–6.30.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3