Abstract
AbstractThis chapter contains a discussion of the results of the data analysis in the previous chapter. In the first part, I will interpret the data from the perspective of Johann Baptist Metz’s concept of dangerous memory. This concept served as the main sensitizing concept in the data analysis; that is, it helped identify meaningful aspects in the interviews collected for this study. As shown below, the concept represents a plausible starting point for understanding the meaning of the memory of Marielle Franco in the present, but there are also limits to the concept. For this reason, I will also explore new ways of interpreting the memory of Franco that go beyond Metz. My reading of the memory of Franco in this chapter will form the basis for a decolonial understanding of dangerous memory in Chap. 5.
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Reference45 articles.
1. Allen, Amy. “Feminist Perspectives on Power.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. Fall 2022 ed. Stanford University. First published October 19, 2005; revised October 28, 2021. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/feminist-power/.
2. ———. “Rethinking Power.” Hypatia 13, no. 1 (1998): 21–40.
3. Althaus-Reid, Marcella. Indecent Theology: Theological Perversions in Sex, Gender and Politics. London: Routledge, 2000. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203468951.
4. ———. “’Let Them Talk … !’Doing Liberation Theology from Latin American Closets.” In Liberation Theology and Sexuality, edited by Marcella Althaus-Reid 5–17. London: Routledge, 2017.
5. Althaus-Reid, Marcella, and Lisa Isherwood. “Thinking Theology and Queer Theory.” Feminist Theology 15, no. 3 (May 1, 2007): 302–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0966735006076168.