The EU as a Geoeconomic Actor? A Review of Recent European Trade and Investment Policies

Author:

Weinhardt Clara,Mau Karsten,Hillebrand Pohl Jens

Abstract

AbstractThe so-called geoeconomic turn stands for the increased tendency of countries to use economic policy instruments to promote or defend national interests vis-à-vis trading partners or rival powers. Scholars note a similar shift in trade and investment policies of the European Union (“EU”). However, there are few studies that examine whether this proclaimed shift at the policy level is reflected in outcomes. Against this background, this chapter examines the EU’s ability to position itself as a defensive geoeconomic actor. Based on three exploratory case studies—investment screening, Most-Favoured Nations clauses in Free Trade Agreements (“FTAs”), and the EU’s (non-)response to China’s Belt and Road Initiative (“BRI”)—we find that the EU’s ability to act in line with its own geoeconomic ambitions varies across the policy initiatives studied. In particular, lack of alignment of individual EU Member States with a common EU policy stance serves as a possible challenge for implementing defensive geoeconomic policies. At the same time, we also find that that the EU’s own framing of what makes a policy initiative “geoeconomic” varies widely, and does not always correspond to the legal design or economic implications of a given initiative. These findings contribute to debates on the EU’s evolving relevance as a global actor and shed new light on recent conceptualizations of the geoeconomic turn.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference53 articles.

1. AEI. (2021). China global investment tracker, dataset. American Enterprise Institute and The Heritage Foundation. Retrieved January 23, 2022, from https://www.aei.org/china-global-investment-tracker/

2. Aggarwal, V., & Reddie, A. (2021). Economic statecraft in the 21st century: Implications for the future of the global trade regime. World Trade Review, 20(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147474562000049X

3. Blackwill, R. D., & Harris, J. M. (2016). War by other means. Harvard University Press.

4. Bohnenberger, F., & Weinhardt, C. (2022). Most favoured nation clauses: A double-edged sword in a geo-economic era. In J. Adriaensen & E. Postnikov (Eds.), The geo-economic turn in FTA negotiations—EU trade policy in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 127–148). Palgrave Macmillan

5. Borrell, J. (2020, September 4). The Sinatra doctrine: How the EU should deal with the US-China competition. Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI). Retrieved January 23, 2022, from https://www.iai.it/en/pubblicazioni/sinatra-doctrine-how-eu-should-deal-us-china-competition

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3