Abstract
AbstractWe can divide the methodology into six parts. One is to construct a wish compass. This is a meditative, philosophical exercise. The second is the collection and analysis of data. The third is to represent the whole of the data on the compass. The fourth is to use the compass and data table to make policy recommendations. We can do this based on one compass, but it is more interesting and more informative if we have several. In the fifth part, we make the exercise more participative. We invite members of the institution or people affected by the institution to suggest data or help with the analysis. The last part is to declare one’s ideological orientation. This last step is important for several reasons. We shall discuss them in due course.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference9 articles.
1. Abdin, A. Y., & Friend, M. (Forthcoming). Doughnuts and compasses: How to decide.
2. Boulding, K. (1949). Income or wealth. Review of Economic Studies, 17, 77–86.
3. Mayumi, K. (2001). The origins of ecological economics; The biomechanics of Georgescu-Roegen. Routledge.
4. Molinini, D. (2019). The weak objectivity of mathematics and its reasonable effectiveness in science. In Axiomathes; Where science meets philosophy. Springer.
5. Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. Random House.