Abstract
AbstractEmissions trading schemes (ETS) have become popular as a policy instrument to tackle climate change. This chapter analyses the decision to deploy carbon markets and their interaction with other instruments in Mexico’s climate policy. Instrument selection has been thoroughly explored in the regulation and public policy literature (Kern et al. in Res Policy 48, 2019; Capano and Lippi in Policy Sci 50(2):269–293, 2016; Wurzel et al. in German Policy Studies 9:21–48, 2013; Harker et al. in Climate Policy 17(4):485–500, 2017; Baldwin et al. in Understanding regulation, Oxford University Press, 2012; Jordan et al. in Policy instruments in practice. Oxford handbooks online 536–549, 2011), but its application to carbon markets is mainly focused on environments such as Europe, the US and, more recently, China. The decision to adopt an ETS relies not only on specific characteristics of each instrument but also on institutional constraints and messy political considerations. A combination of preferences and institutional factors affect the choice of instruments, and the ultimate decision must be legitimate and instrumental for each context. I analyse the considerations involved in the deployment of the ETS pilot project, looking at its distinctive characteristics and those it shares with other available instruments, as well as the requirements for its implementation.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference17 articles.
1. Bailey I, Maresh S (2009) Scales and networks of neoliberal climate governance: the regulatory and territorial logics of European Union emissions trading. Trans Inst Br Geogr 34(4):445–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2009.00355.x
2. Baldwin R, Cave M, Lodge M (2012) Understanding regulation. Oxford University Press
3. California Cap and Trade (2020). Center for climate and energy solutions. https://www.c2es.org/content/california-cap-and-trade/
4. Capano G, Lippi A (2016) How policy instruments are chosen: patterns of decision makers’ choices. Policy Sci 50(2):269–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9267-8
5. Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) (2020) California’s cap and trade program step by step. https://www.edf.org/sites/default/files/californias-cap-and-trade-program-step-by-step.pdf
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献