Author:
El-Hani Charbel N.,de Lima Felipe Rebelo Gomes,Nunes-Neto Nei de Freitas
Abstract
AbstractIn this chapter, we will address criticisms to the theory of ecological functions introduced by Nunes-Neto et al. (2014). In doing so, we intend to further develop the theory, as a possible basis for naturalizing the teleological and normative dimensions of ecological functions. We will also take the first steps in the construction of an integrated scientific and ethical approach to sustainability that is intended to avoid an anthropocentric perspective.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference160 articles.
1. Adams, F. R. (1979). A goal-state theory of function attributions. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 9, 493–518.
2. Ahl, V., & Allen, T. F. H. (1996). Hierarchy theory: A vision, vocabulary, and epistemology. Columbia University Press.
3. Allen, C., & Bekoff, M. (1995). Biological function, adaptation and natural design. Philosophy of Science, 62, 609–622.
4. Amarasekare, P., & Nisbet, R. M. (2001). Spatial heterogeneity, source-sink dynamics, and the local coexistence of competing species. American Naturalist, 158, 572–584.
5. Amundson, R., & Lauder, G. V. (1994). Function without purpose: The uses of causal role function in evolutionary biology. Biology and Philosophy, 9, 443–469.