Abstract
AbstractThis book brings forward concepts to support a cultural-historical digital methodology. Specifically, this chapter draws on the dialectics of crisis to articulate a series of research innovations that are presented throughout the book. The chapter outlines the theorising of the methods, and discusses the concepts of e-motion, cultural-historical loop model and builds on the legacy of a wholeness approach to elaborate how the original concepts introduced by Mariane Hedegaard work in digital contexts. Crisis as a dialectical relation between an everyday and scientific reading are foregrounded in this chapter, and through this lens the chapter presents a scholarly contribution across the three broad principles of dialectics, historicity, and cultural-historical practice-centred science in times of crisis.
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Reference29 articles.
1. Alagappan, S. (2021). The timeless journey of the Möbius strip. Scientific American. Accessed 8 Jan 2023.
2. Chaiklin, S. (2011). The role of practice in cultural-historical science. In M. Kontopoldis et al. (Eds.), Children development and education. International perspectives on early childhood education and development (pp. 227–246). Springer Science + Business Media.
3. Dafermos, M. (2015). Reflection on the relationship between cultural-historical theory and dialectics. Психологическая наука и образование, 20(3).
4. Dafermos, M. (2022). Discussing the concept of crisis in cultural-historical activity research: A dialectical perspective. Human Arenas, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-022-00289-4
5. Edwards, A., Fleer, M., & Bøttcher, L. (2019). Cultural-historical approaches to studying learning and development: Societal, institutional and personal perspectives. In A. Edwards, M. Fleer, & L. Bøttcher (Eds.), Cultural-historical approaches to studying learning and development. Perspectives in cultural-historical research, vol. 6. Springer. https://doi-org.galanga.hvl.no/10.1007/978-981-13-6826-4_1