Abstract
AbstractThe goal of this chapter is to understand the functions and objectives of environmental liability law. This task requires going beyond the traditional perspective of the judge or the lawyer to a certain extent, as these roles are usually concerned with the restitution of or compensation for environmental damage that has already occurred, a repressive perspective which is typically contrasted with the preventive function of environmental liability. In line with the latter function, liability law can be considered as a regulatory approach to cope with environmental problems and thus as a complement or alternative to other instruments of international law which are designed to minimise or eliminate environmental risks.
Funder
German Environment Agency
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference86 articles.
1. Albers J (2015) Responsibility and liability in the context of transboundary movements of hazardous wastes by sea: existing rules and the 1999 liability protocol to the basel convention. Springer, Berlin
2. Augenstein DH, Boyle A, Singh Galeigh N (2010) Study on the legal framework on human rights and the environment applicable to European enterprises operating outside the European Union. European Commission, Brussels
3. Barrett S (1997) Towards a theory of international cooperation. In: Carraro C, Siniscalco D (eds) New directions in the economic theory of the environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 239–280
4. Barrett S (2008) An economic theory of international environmental law. Part II analytical tools and perspectives, Chapter 11. In: Bodansky D, Brunnée J, Hey E (eds) The Oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 231–261
5. Batie SB (2008) Wicked problems and applied economics. Am J Agric Econ 90(5):1176–1191