Author:
Proelss Alexander,Steenkamp Robert C.
Abstract
AbstractTwenty-nine States (the ‘Consultative Parties’), each with a substantial interest in Antarctica, collectively manage Antarctica through a system of consensus-based decisions. Traditionally, the Antarctic Treaty together with recommendations and measures adopted by the Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meetings (ATCM), the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CAMLR Convention) and the Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Seals (CCAS) form the basis of the Antarctic Treaty System. However, the Consultative Parties began to expand their environmental responsibilities in Antarctica in 1970 and agreed that they “should assume responsibility for the protection of the environment and the wise use of the Treaty area”. A major step in this regard was the addition to the Antarctic Treaty System of the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty (PEPAT or the Protocol). Together with safeguarding free and peaceful scientific research, the Protocol incorporates the protection of the Antarctic environment into the Antarctic Treaty System. The Protocol has six annexes, with Annex VI (Liabilities Arising from Environmental Emergencies) being a product of the obligations contained in Articles 15 and 16 of the PEPAT. Specifically, Article 16 of the PEPAT states that:
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference35 articles.
1. Abdullah NC, Shah RM, Husin ZH, Rahman HA (2015) Antarctic tourism: the responsibilities and liabilities of tour operators and state parties. Procedia – Soc Behav Sci 202(2015):227–233
2. Addison-Agyei S (2007) The Liability Annex – one step toward a comprehensive regime. Environ Policy Law 37(4):313–320
3. Australian Antarctic Division (2019) Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty (The Madrid Protocol). https://www.antarctica.gov.au/about-antarctica/law-and-treaty/the-madrid-protocol/. Accessed 1 Apr 2022
4. Bastmeijer K (2017) Antarctica. In: Nollkaemper A, Plakokefalos I (eds) The practice of shared responsibility in international law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 399–425
5. Bastmeijer K, Lamers M, Harcha J (2008) Permanent land-based facilities for tourism in Antarctica: the need for regulation. RECIEL 17(1):84–99