Abstract
AbstractFor obvious reasons, space activities are generally classed as ultra-hazardous endeavours, i.e. they are inherently dangerous, not only for the various vehicles leaving the Earth atmosphere, but also the cargo such vehicles carry, be it human or otherwise. Additionally, space activities generate environmental risks in outer space that can, at times, impact the Earth as what goes up, must inevitably come down. The hazards of spaceflight come from multiple sources, including, but not limited to, the technology used (e.g. nuclear power sources) and the hostile nature of outer space which is difficult to reach, difficult to survive in and difficult to return from. This inherent danger has been tragically highlighted not only by the shuttle disasters involving Challenger (1986) and Columbia (2003) but also by the vast field of radioactive debris left in Canada after the uncontrolled re-entry of the Soviet satellite Cosmos 954 in 1977. The latter accident exemplifies that ultra-hazardous activities require liability rules because when something goes wrong, the consequences can be significant for any injured parties.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference15 articles.
1. Alexander RE (1978) Measuring damages under the convention on international liability for damage caused by space objects. J Space Law 6(1):151–160
2. Bueckling A (1982) Völkerrechtliche Haftung für Raumfahrtschäden nach dem Weltraumhaftungsabkommen vom 29. März 1972. Verlag Versicherungswirtschaft, Karlsruhe
3. Christol CQ (1980) International liability for damage caused by space objects. Am J Int Law 74(2):346–371
4. Cocca AA (1984) From full compensation to total responsibility. In: Proceedings of the 26th Colloquium on the Law of Outer Space, AIAA Washington, pp 157–159
5. Cohen A (1984) Cosmos 954 and the international law of satellite accidents. Yale J Int Law 10(78):78–91
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献