Author:
Nikishina Irina,Bondarenko Alexander,Zaczek Sebastian,Haag Onno Lander,Hagen Matthias,Biemann Chris
Abstract
AbstractThe comparative argumentative machine CAM can retrieve arguments that answer comparative questions—questions that ask which of several to-be-compared options should be favored in some scenario. In this paper, we describe how we equipped CAM with a better answer stance detection (i.e., a better detection of which option “wins” a comparison) and with system variants to support non-English requests. As for the improved answer stance detection, we develop RoBERTa-based approaches and experimentally show them to be more effective than previous feature-based and LLM-based stance detectors. As for the multilingualism, in a proof of concept, we compare two approaches to support Russian requests and answers: (1) translating the original English CAM data and (2) using an existing replica of CAM on native Russian data. Comparing the translation-based and the replica-based CAM variants in a user study shows that combining their answers seems to be the most promising. For individual questions, the retrieved arguments of the two variants are often different and of quite diverse relevance and quality. As a demonstrator, we deploy a first multilingual CAM version that combines translation-based and replica-based outputs for English and Russian and that can easily be extended to further languages.
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Reference45 articles.
1. Allaway, E., McKeown, K.R.: Zero-shot stance detection: a dataset and model using generalized topic representations. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2020, pp. 8913–8931. ACL (2020). https://doi.org/10.18653/V1/2020.EMNLP-MAIN.717
2. Anand, P., Walker, M.A., Abbott, R., Tree, J.E.F., Bowmani, R., Minor, M.: Cats rule and dogs drool! Classifying stance in online debate. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis, WASSA@ACL 2011, pp. 1–9. ACL (2011). https://aclanthology.org/W11-1701/
3. Bar-Haim, R., Bhattacharya, I., Dinuzzo, F., Saha, A., Slonim, N.: Stance classification of context-dependent claims. In: Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, EACL 2017, pp. 251–261. ACL (2017). https://doi.org/10.18653/V1/E17-1024
4. Bondarenko, A., Ajjour, Y., Dittmar, V., Homann, N., Braslavski, P., Hagen, M.: Towards understanding and answering comparative questions. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM 2022, pp. 66–74. ACM (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3488560.3498534
5. Lecture Notes in Computer Science;A Bondarenko,2020