Automatic Analysis of Political Debates and Manifestos: Successes and Challenges

Author:

Ceron TaniseORCID,Barić Ana,Blessing AndréORCID,Haunss SebastianORCID,Kuhn Jonas,Lapesa Gabriella,Padó SebastianORCID,Papay Sean,Zauchner Patricia F.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe opinions of political actors (e.g., politicians, parties, organizations) expressed through claims are the core elements of political debates and decision-making. Political actors communicate through different channels: parties publish manifestos for major elections, while individual actors make statements on a day-to-day basis as reflected in the media. These two channels offer different approaches for analysis: Manifestos, on the one hand, are useful to characterize the parties’ positions at a global ideological level over time. In contrast, individual statements can be collected to analyze debates in particular policy domains on a fine-grained level, in terms of individual actors and claims. In this article, we summarize a series of studies we have carried out. We apply NLP-driven (semi-)automatic analyses on these two channels and compare their potentials and challenges. The fine-grained analysis yields rich insights into the communication but comes at the cost of three challenges: (a) a substantial hunger for manual annotation, introducing practical hurdles for analysis both within and across languages; (b) difficulties in claim classification arising from the uneven frequency distribution over the theory-based annotation schemas; (c) the need to map actor mentions onto canonical versions. Manifesto-based analysis avoids these challenges to a substantial extent when a more coarse-grained analysis of party positions is sufficient. We highlight the benefits and challenges of both approaches, and conclude by outlining perspectives for addressing the challenges in future research.

Publisher

Springer Nature Switzerland

Reference46 articles.

1. Barić, A., Padó, S., Papay, S.: Actor identification in discourse: a challenge for LLMs? In: Proceedings of the EACL CoDi Workshop, pp. 64–70. St. Julians, Malta (2024)

2. Barnes, J., Klinger, R.: Embedding projection for targeted cross-lingual sentiment: model comparisons and a real-world study. JAIR 66, 691–742 (2019)

3. Benoit, K., Laver, M.: Party Policy in Modern Democracies. Routledge (2006)

4. Blokker, N., Blessing, A., Dayanik, E., Kuhn, J., Padó, S., Lapesa, G.: Between welcome culture and border fence: the European refugee crisis in German newspaper reports. LRE 57, 121–153 (2023)

5. Brown, T., et al.: Language models are few-shot learners. In: Proceedings of NeurIPS, pp. 1877–1901 (2020)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3