Author:
Skiba Kenneth,Thimm Matthias,Wallner Johannes P.
Abstract
AbstractWe present a general framework to rank assumption in assumption-based argumentation frameworks (ABA frameworks), relying on their relationship to other assumptions and the syntactical structure of the ABA framework. We propose a new family of semantics for ABA frameworks that is using reductions to the abstract argumentation setting and leveraging existing ranking-based semantics for abstract argumentation. We show the suitability of these semantics by investigating a case study based on medical recommendations for patients with multiple health conditions and show that the relationship of the recommendations are enough to establish a ranking between the recommendations.
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Reference28 articles.
1. Ahsan, M.M., Siddique, Z.: Machine learning-based heart disease diagnosis: a systematic literature review. Artif. Intell. Med. 128, 102289 (2022)
2. Amgoud, L., Ben-Naim, J.: Ranking-based semantics for argumentation frameworks. In: Proceedings of SUM 2013, pp. 134–147 (2013)
3. Ashfaq, A., Lingman, M., Sensoy, M., Nowaczyk, S.: Deed: Deep evidential doctor. Artif. Intell. 325, 104019 (2023)
4. Atkinson, K., et al.: Toward artificial argumentation. AI Magazine 38(3), 25–36 (2017)
5. Baroni, P., Caminada, M., Giacomin, M.: Abstract argumentation frameworks and their semantics. In: Baroni, P., Gabbay, D., Giacomin, M., van der Torre, L. (eds.) Handbook of Formal Argumentation, pp. 159–236. College Publications (2018)