1. Adams, J., Williams, A., Lancaster, B., & Foley, M. (2007). Advantages and uses of check-all-that-apply response compared to traditional scaling of attributes for salty snacks. In 7th Pangborn Sensory Science Symposium. Minneapolis, MN, USA.
2. Agudelo, A., Varela, P., & Fiszman, S. (2015). Methods for a deeper understanding of the sensory perception of fruit fillings. Food Hydrocolloids, 46, 160–171.
3. Almiron-Roig, E., Green, H., Virgili, R., Aeschlimann, J.-M., Moser, M., & Erkner, A. (2009). Validation of a new hand-held electronic appetite rating system against the pen and paper method. Appetite, 53(3), 465–468.
4. Ares, G., & Jaeger, S. R. (2015). 11 – Check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions with consumers in practice: Experimental considerations and impact on outcome. In Rapid sensory profiling techniques. Woodhead Publishing.
5. Ares, G., & Varela, P. (2018). Chapter 8 – Consumer-based methodologies for sensory characterization. In I. G. Ares & P. Varela (Eds.), Methods in consumer research, Volume 1. Woodhead Publishing.