Turning to Animal Agency in the Anthropocene

Author:

Blattner Charlotte E.

Abstract

AbstractAgency is central to humans’ individual rights and their organization as a community. Human agency is recognized in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights through guaranteed rights, such as the right to life, basic education, freedom of expression, and the freedom to form personal relationships, which all protect humans from tyranny and oppression. Though studies of animal agency consistently suggest that we grossly underestimate the capacity of animals to make decisions, determine and take action, and to organize themselves individually and as groups, few have concerned themselves with whether and how animal agency is relevant for the law and vice versa. Currently, most laws offer no guarantee that animals’ agency will be respected, and fail to respond when animals resist the human systems that govern them. This failure emerges from profound prejudices and deep-seated anthropocentric biases that shape the law, including law-making processes. Law and law-making operating exclusively as self-judging systems is widely decried and denounced—except in animal law. This chapter identifies standpoint acknowledgement as a means to dismantle these tendencies, and provides instructions on how to ask the right questions. It concludes by calling for an “animal agency turn” across disciplines, to challenge our assumptions about how we ought to organize human-animal relationships politically and personally, and to increase our civic competence and courage, empathy, participation, common engagement, and respect for animal alterity.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference48 articles.

1. Anderson, U., M. Benne, M. Bloomsmith, and T. Maple. 2002. Retreat space and human visitor density moderate undesirable behavior in petting zoo animals. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 5 (2): 125–137.

2. Blattner, C.E. 2019. Protecting animals within and across borders: Extraterritorial Jurisdiction and the challenges of globalization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press..

3. Blattner, C.E. 2020. Animal labour: Toward a prohibition of forced labour and a right to Freely choose one’s work. In Animal labour: A new frontier of interspecies justice?, ed. C.E. Blattner, K. Coulter, and W. Kymlicka, 91–115. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

4. Blattner, C.E., S. Donaldson, and R. Wilcox. 2020. Animal agency in community: A political multispecies ethnography of VINE sanctuary. Politics and Animals 5: 33–54.

5. Cojocaru, M.-D., and P. von Gall. 2019. Beyond plausibility checks: A case for moral doubt In review processes of animal experimentation. In Animal experimentation: Working towards a paradigm change, ed. K. Herrmann and K. Wayne, 289–304. Leiden: Brill.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3