Author:
De Paula Vieira Andreia,Anthony Raymond
Abstract
AbstractAnimals, like human beings, are prone to suffering harms, such as disease, injury and death, as a result of anthropogenic and natural disasters. Animals are disproportionately prone to risk and adversely affected by disasters, and thus require humane and respectful care when disasters strike, due to socially situated vulnerabilities based on how human communities assess and value their moral standing and function. The inability to integrate animals into disaster risk and management practices and processes can sometimes be associated with a lack of understanding about what animal ethics and animal health and welfare require when designing disaster management programs. This chapter seeks to reimagine human responsibility towards animals for disaster management. The pervasiveness of disasters and their impacts on animals, human-animal and animal-environment relationships underscore the importance of effective animal disaster management supported by sound ethical decision-making processes. To this end, we delineate six ethically responsible animal caretaking aims for consideration when developing disaster management plans and policies. These aims, which address central vulnerabilities experienced by domesticated animals during disasters, are meant to be action-guiding within the disaster management context. They include: (1) Save lives and mitigate harm; (2) Protect animal welfare and respect animals’ experiences; (3) Observe, recognize and promote distributive justice; (4) Advance public involvement; (5) Empower caregivers, guardians, owners and community members; (6) Bolster public health and veterinary community professionalism, including engagement in multidisciplinary teams and applied scientific developments. To bring about these aims, we offer a set of practical and straightforward action steps for animal caregivers and disaster management teams to ensure that animals’ interests are systematically promoted in disaster management. They include: (1) Respect and humane treatment; (2) Collaboration and effective disaster communication; (3) Strengthening systems of information sharing, surveillance, scientific research, management and training; (4) Community outreach and proactive contact; (5) Cultural sensitivity and attitudes check, and (6) Reflection, review and reform.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference66 articles.
1. Allen, H., and A. Taylor. 2014. Evolution of US foot-and-mouth disease response strategy. Disaster Prevention and Management 23: 19–39.
2. American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA). 2012. Emergency Preparedness and Response Guide. Available at: https://ebusiness.avma.org/files/productdownloads/emerg_prep_resp_guide.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2019.
3. American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA). 2013. Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals: 2013 Edition. Available at: www.avma.org/KB/Policies/Documents/euthanasia.pdf. Accessed 1 March 2019.
4. American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA). 2019. Guidelines for the Depopulation of Animals 2019 Edition. Available at: https://www.avma.org/KB/Policies/documents/AVMA-Guidelines-for-the-Depopulation-of-Animals.pdf. Accessed 3 June 2019.
5. American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA). 2020a. Evaluating emergency euthanasia or depopulation of livestock and poultry. Available at: https://www.avma.org/sites/default/files/2020-04/Humane-Endings-flowchart-2020.pdf. Accessed 29 April 2020.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献