1. E. Hovy, M. Marcus, M. Palmer, L. Ramshaw, R. Weischedel, OntoNotes: the 90% solution, in Proceedings of the Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology (HLT-NAACL 2006) (Association for Computational Linguistics, New York, 2006), pp. 57–60
2. J. Nivre, Ž. Agić, L. Ahrenberg, et. al., Universal dependencies 1.4 (2016). http://hdl.handle.net/11234/1-1827
3. N. Ide, C. Chiarcos, M. Stede, S. Cassidy, Designing annotation schemes: from model to representation, in Handbook of Linguistic Annotation, ed. by N. Ide, J. Pustejovsky, Text, Speech, and Language Technology (Springer, Berlin, 2017)
4. C. Chiarcos, Ontologies of linguistic annotation: survey and perspectives, in Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Istanbul, 2012, pp. 303–310
5. K. Verspoor, K. Livingston, Towards adaptation of linguistic annotations to scholarly annotation formalisms on the Semantic Web, in Proceedings of the 6th Linguistic Annotation Workshop (Association for Computational Linguistics, Jeju, 2012), pp. 75–84