Shared Physical Custody and Child Maintenance Arrangements: A Comparative Analysis of 13 Countries Using a Model Family Approach

Author:

Hakovirta Mia,Skinner Christine

Abstract

AbstractThis book chapter provides new insights to the question of how child maintenance policies have responded to changing post separation family arrangements and most specifically shared physical custody (SPC). We analyse how SPC is implemented and how it operates in child maintenance policies in 13 countries: Australia, Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Iceland, New Zealand, Norway, Spain, Sweden, the UK and the U.S. The comparative analysis is based on vignette questionnaire collected in 2017. There are differences in how countries have acknowledged and recognized shared physical custody in their child maintenance policies. It varies from complete annulment of obligations, to some countries making finer grained adjustments to reduce child maintenance obligations and yet others’ making no changes as a result of shared physical custody, with the paying parent still having to provide the full amount of child maintenance. It seems there is no standard practice and nor do the different arrangements map easily onto child maintenance scheme typology. The latter is surprising, as it might have been expected that similarly structured child maintenance schemes would treat shared physical custody in similar ways. This variability demonstrates a lack of coherence across child maintenance policies on how to deal with this phenomenon of greater gender equality in post-separation parenting arrangements.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference49 articles.

1. Andress, H.-J., Borgloh, B., Bröckel, M., Giesselmann, M., & Hummelstein, D. (2006). The economic consequences of partnership dissolution – A comparative analysis of panel studies from Belgium, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, and Sweden. European Sociological Review, 22(5), 533–560.

2. Barter, C. & Renold, E. (1999). The use of vignettes in qualitative research, University of Surrey, Social Research Update 25–25. https://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU25.html, Accessed 17 Feb 2021.

3. Bartfeld, J. (2011). Shared placement: An overview of prevalence, trends, economic implications, and impacts on child well-being. Madison: University of Wisconsin–Madison: Institute for Research on Poverty.

4. Beld, J. M., & Biernat, L. (2002). Federal intent for state child support guidelines: Income shares, cost shares and the realities of shared parenting. Family Law quarterly, 37(2), 1165–2002.

5. Belmokhtar, Z. (2014). Une pensionn alimentaire fixée par les juges pour deux tiers des enfants de parents séparés. Infostat Justice numero 128. http://www.justice.gouv.fr/art_pix/INFOSTAT%20128.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2019.

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3