Author:
Featherstone Lisa,Byrnes Cassandra,Maturi Jenny,Minto Kiara,Mickelburgh Renée,Donaghy Paige
Abstract
AbstractAffirmative consent was first articulated on college campuses in the United States in the 1990s. Affirmative consent demanded verbal, positive consent during each sexual encounter, and for each individual part of the sexual activity. Consent had to be meaningful and enthusiastic. While later interpretations would shift and change, and in many instances, non-verbal communication might count as affirmative consent, the model required active and positive participation from everyone during a sexual encounter. An absence of agreement—through silence or passivity—does not meet the standard of affirmative consent.This chapter outlines what affirmative consent was and is, how and why it developed, and why it has been widely imagined as a useful tool for navigating sexual encounters, and for preventing sexual violence. It charts what was initially a radical, alternative suggestion, to a concept that is now institutionalised in the mainstream. Just as importantly, it investigates the challenges of affirmative consent, in particular noting that power imbalances do not allow all people the freedom and bodily autonomy to assert consent. The chapter examines cases where affirmative consent cannot be freely given or denied, including situations where intimate partner violence occurs, or where other practices of coercion or powerlessness are in place. Finally, the chapter traces some of the recent legislative changes across Western cultures, which have enshrined affirmative consent in the law, despite the challenges of ensuring equal access to autonomy.
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Reference57 articles.
1. Abrams, Andy, and Kristine Herman. 1994. Antioch Is Not Legislating “Sexual Correctness”. The Chronicle of Higher Education, January 26, B3.
2. Alabi, Olabisi Adurasola. 2019. Sexual Violence Laws Redefined in the Me Too Era: Affirmative Consent & Statutes of Limitations. Widener Law Review 25 (1): 69–90.
3. Anderson, Patricia, et al. 2017. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children and Child Sexual Abuse in Institutional Settings. In Report for the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse. Sydney: APO.
4. Angiollo, Dominic S. 2018. Risky Sexual Behavior—The “Broken Windows” of Sexual Assault: A Proposal for Universities to Incorporate Targeted Intervention to Bridge The Gap Between Sexual Assault Prevention and Response. The American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law 26 (3): 881–945.
5. Boyd, Melanie. 2014. The Case for Affirmative Consent (Or, Why You Can Stop Worrying That Your Son Will Go To Prison For Having Sex When He Gets To College). The Huffington Post, December 17, 2014. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-case-for-affirmative-consent_b_6312476. Accessed 3 Aug 2022.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献