1. Banicki, K. (2018). Psychology, conceptual confusion, and disquieting situationism: Response to Lamiell. Theory and Psychology, 28, 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318759609 .
2. Cowles, M. (1989). Statistics in psychology: An historical perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
3. Dilthey, W. (1894). Ideen über eine beschreibende und zergliedernde Psychologie [Ideas concerning a descriptive and an analytical psychology]. Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Zweiter Halbband, 1309–1407.
4. Gantt, E. E., & Williams, R. N. (Eds.). (2018). On hijacking science: Exploring the nature and consequences of overreach in psychology. New York: Routledge.
5. Gigerenzer, G. (1987). Probabilistic thinking and the fight against subjectivity. In G. Gigerenzer, L. Krueger, & M. S. Morgan (Eds.), The probabilistic revolution: Ideas in the sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 11–33). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.