Generic Consents in Digital Ecosystems: Legal, Psychological, and Technical Perspectives

Author:

Steffes Bianca,Salemi Simone,Feth Denis,Groen Eduard C.

Abstract

AbstractConsent is an important authorization basis for the processing of personal data. According to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), consents must be as specific and unambiguous as possible. In practice, however, this leads to users being overwhelmed by the large number of consent requests, which can ultimately be detrimental to freedom of choice. What the overwhelming number of requests for consent can lead to is reflected by the so-called cookie fatigue problem: users have become accustomed to accepting cookies on websites only to get rid of cookie banners as quickly as possible. As cookies do not always lead to the collection of personal data, the cookie fatigue problem cannot be transferred entirely to the problem we would like to address in this chapter. It only serves as an example for the consequences of overloading a data subject with requests for consent. As the GDPR demands that consent be informed and given freely, the current strategy of consent handling cannot be in the spirit of the data protection legislation. In this chapter, we present our vision of how consent can be integrated in the context of digital ecosystems from three perspectives: (1) achieving legal compliance according to data protection law, (2) demonstrating technical feasibility, and (3) assuring user-friendliness by adding cognition to the equation. Our approach aims to enable “generic consents” within a clearly defined scope and context. Although generic consents that serve as a “catch-all” are generally not allowed, we leverage the specific characteristics of digital ecosystems to impose limitations that can justify their use in this particular context. We will also detail the legal implications and present implementation options.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference51 articles.

1. Agrawal, R., Kiernan, J., Srikant, R., & Xu, Y. (2002). Chapter 14—Hippocratic databases. In P. A. Bernstein, Y. E. Ioannidis, R. Ramakrishnan, & D. Papadias (Eds.), VLDB ’02: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Very Large Databases (pp. 143–154). Morgan Kaufmann.

2. Albayrak, T., Karasakal, S., Kocabulut, O., & Dursun, A. (2020). Customer loyalty towards travel agency websites: The role of trust and hedonic value. Journal of Quality Assurance in Hospitality & Tourism, 21(1), 50–77.

3. Ali, A. S., Zaaba, Z. F., Singh, M. M., & Hussain, A. (2020). Readability of websites security privacy policies: A survey on text content and readers. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(6s), 1661–1672.

4. Appenzeller, A., Rode, E., Krempel, E., & Beyerer, J. (2020). Enabling data sovereignty for patients through digital consent enforcement. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, PETRA ’20. Association for Computing Machinery.

5. Assion, S. (2021). Stellungnahme als Sachverständiger zum Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Regelung des Datenschutzes und des Schutzes der Privatsphäre in der Telekommunikation und bei Telemedien (TTDSG), BT-Drucksache 19/27441

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3