Teacher Feedback Tools-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Teacher Feedback Tools

Published:2023 Issue: Volume: Page:183-202
ISSN:
Container-title:Digital Writing Technologies in Higher Education
language:
Short-container-title:

Author:

Anson Chris M.

Abstract

AbstractBefore digital technology, students submitted handwritten or typed papers to their instructor, who responded with handwritten marginal and end comments, often with the infamous “red pen” (Dukes & Albenisi, 2013). After the introduction of word processing, students typically printed out and submitted hard copies of their final drafts, on which the instructor would handwrite comments. Today, most instructors (and all who teach online) ask students to send their (digitally produced) writing as email attachments or upload them to a learning management site or other cloud-based repository, allowing them, in turn, to provide digital feedback. Tools for such feedback have enabled instructors to comment with greater efficiency, clarity (avoiding the longstanding problem of students having to decipher scribbled remarks), and support. After a brief historical introduction, this chapter will describe four types of digital tools for teacher feedback: digital annotation tools, text expansion tools, voice-to-text tools, and tools for audio and audio-visual feedback.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Link

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-031-36033-6_12

Reference52 articles.

1. Anson, C. M. (forthcoming). Exploring the relational in teacher response to student writing: New directions for the study of linguistically and socially just practices. In K. Blewett & J. Post (Eds.), Reconceptualizing response: Using instructor feedback to promote equity and linguistic justice in the writing classroom.

2. Anson, C. M. (1989). Response styles and the paradox of uncertainty. In C. M. Anson (Ed.), Writing and response: Theory, practice, and research (pp. 1–11). National Council of Teachers of English.

3. Anson, C. M. (1997). In your own voice: Using recorded commentary to respond to writing. In P. Elbow & M. D. Sorcinelli (Eds.), Assigning and responding to writing in the disciplines (pp. 105–113). Jossey-Bass.

4. Anson, C. M. (2000). Talking about text: The use of recorded commentary in response to student writing. In R. Straub (Ed.), A sourcebook on responding to student writing (pp. 165–174). Hampton Press.

5. Anson, C. M. (2012). What good is it? The effects of teacher response on students’ development. In N. Elliott & L. Perelman (Eds.), Writing assessment in the 21st century: Essays in honor of Edward M. White (pp. 187–202). Hampton Press.