Digital Note-Taking for Writing

Author:

Pitura JoannaORCID

Abstract

AbstractNote-taking is prevalent in academia—it is the basis of scholarly work, i.e. searching for information, collecting and reading literature, writing and collaborating, referred to as a “primitive” that assists these information activities (e.g., Palmer, C. L., Teffeau, L. C., & Pirmann, C. M. (2009). Scholarly information practices in the online environment: Themes from the literature and implications for library service development. OCLC Research. https://accesson.kisti.re.kr/upload2/i_report/1239602399570.pdf). Researchers and higher education students take notes throughout the inquiry cycle, i.e. while designing research, collecting data, analysing data, and writing the report. In addition, with written assignments being a considerable part of student academic work, notes are taken in the writing process, from generating ideas for writing tasks, through text planning and drafting to its editing. As this process may be challenging, digital note-taking has the potential to facilitate writing in academic contexts (Matysek, A., & Tomaszczyk, J. (2020). Digital wisdom in research work. Zagadnienia Informacji Naukowej—Studia Informacyjne, 58(2A(116A)), 98–113. https://doi.org/10.36702/zin.705). Yet, despite the availability of literature concerning formal requirements of writing, such as style, structure, referencing, etc., relatively little literature deals with the note-taking activity that assists academic writing, and even less with digital note-taking. In order to bridge this gap, this chapter focuses on the note-taking activity and shows how digital tools can support note takers in the academic writing context.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference55 articles.

1. Ahrens, S. (2017). How to take smart notes: One simple technique to boost writing, learning and thinking—for students, academics and nonfiction book writers. [Sönke Ahrens].

2. Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman.

3. Appleton, M. (n.d.). A short history of bi-directional links. (n.d.). Maggie Appleton. https://maggieappleton.com/bidirectionals

4. Bennett, J., & McKain, D. (2018). The iPad: A mobile learning device and innovative note-taking tool. In A. Ali Khan & S. Umair (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Mobile Devices and Smart Gadgets in K-12 Education (pp. 194–224). IGI Global.

5. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2009). The psychology of written composition. Routledge.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3