Beyond MS Word: Alternatives and Developments

Author:

Rapp ChristianORCID,Heilmann Till,Kruse OttoORCID

Abstract

AbstractMicrosoft Word, the word processing software developed by Microsoft in 1983, established itself as the market leader in the 1990s and 2000s and remained the gold standard for many years. Despite its obvious benefits, it always faced criticism from various quarters. We address the persistent criticism that MS Word is overloaded with features and distracts from writing rather than facilitating it. Alternatives, mainly distraction-free editors and text editors for use with a markup language, are briefly reviewed and compared to MS Word. A serious challenger emerged in 2006 with Google Docs, a cloud-based writing software that has moved text production into the platform era, enabling files to be shared and creating collaborative writing spaces. Even though Google Docs failed to break the dominance of MS Word, it became the trend-setter in online writing. Microsoft and Apple soon followed by designing complex web environments for institutions and companies rather than individual writers. We give an overview of technologies that have evolved to challenge the supremacy of MS Word or compete for market share. By this, we hope to provide clues as to the future development of word processing.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference22 articles.

1. Bazerman, C. (2018). What do humans do best? Developing communicative humans in the changing socio-cyborgian landscape. In S. Logan & W. Slater (Eds.), Perspectives on academic and professional writing in an age of accountability (pp. 187–203). Southern Illinois University Press.

2. Bergin, T. J. (2006). The proliferation and consolidation of word processing software: 1985–1995. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 28(4), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/MAHC.2006.77

3. Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation. MIT Press.

4. Bray, N. (2013). Writing with Scrivener: A hopeful tale of disappearing tools, flatulence, and word processing redemption. Computers and Composition, 30(3), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2013.07.002

5. Burkeman, O. (2006, November 4), Writely, Sam Schillace, The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2006/nov/04/news.weekendmagazine7

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3