Abstract
AbstractMicrosoft Word, the word processing software developed by Microsoft in 1983, established itself as the market leader in the 1990s and 2000s and remained the gold standard for many years. Despite its obvious benefits, it always faced criticism from various quarters. We address the persistent criticism that MS Word is overloaded with features and distracts from writing rather than facilitating it. Alternatives, mainly distraction-free editors and text editors for use with a markup language, are briefly reviewed and compared to MS Word. A serious challenger emerged in 2006 with Google Docs, a cloud-based writing software that has moved text production into the platform era, enabling files to be shared and creating collaborative writing spaces. Even though Google Docs failed to break the dominance of MS Word, it became the trend-setter in online writing. Microsoft and Apple soon followed by designing complex web environments for institutions and companies rather than individual writers. We give an overview of technologies that have evolved to challenge the supremacy of MS Word or compete for market share. By this, we hope to provide clues as to the future development of word processing.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference22 articles.
1. Bazerman, C. (2018). What do humans do best? Developing communicative humans in the changing socio-cyborgian landscape. In S. Logan & W. Slater (Eds.), Perspectives on academic and professional writing in an age of accountability (pp. 187–203). Southern Illinois University Press.
2. Bergin, T. J. (2006). The proliferation and consolidation of word processing software: 1985–1995. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 28(4), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/MAHC.2006.77
3. Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation. MIT Press.
4. Bray, N. (2013). Writing with Scrivener: A hopeful tale of disappearing tools, flatulence, and word processing redemption. Computers and Composition, 30(3), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2013.07.002
5. Burkeman, O. (2006, November 4), Writely, Sam Schillace, The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2006/nov/04/news.weekendmagazine7