Rights Claims in Anti-abortion Campaigns in Poland and Sweden

Author:

Selberg Rebecca,Kolankiewicz Marta

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter presents two case analyses, one situated in Sweden and the other in Poland, where attempts have been made to intervene in the existing laws regulating access to abortion. The first case involves the lawsuits filed by midwives in Sweden who claimed to have been discriminated against on the grounds of their religion when they had been turned down for work due to their objection to performing abortion as part of the job description. The second is that of a Polish civic legislative initiative aimed at restricting the prevailing abortion legislation in Poland in cases of foetal anomalies. We explore the rights claims deployed in these anti-abortion campaigns with an aim to contribute to the growing feminist scholarship on rhetorical devices and mobilisation tactics employed in the struggles over access to abortion. The two cases illustrate how anti-abortion mobilisations have been using rights claims that traditionally had been employed by feminist movements fighting for access to abortion. While it can be observed that this trend is part of a broader development of what has been described as a transnational anti-gender movement’s appeal to the law, our analyses illustrate different and context-sensitive ways in which rights claims are articulated.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference57 articles.

1. Autorino, T., Mattioli, F., & Mencarini, L. (2020). The Impact of Gynecologists’ Conscientious Objection on Abortion Access. Social Science Research, 87, 102403.

2. Boy-Żeleński, T. (2013/1929). Piekło Kobiet. Jirafa Roja.

3. Brännström, L. (2017). Juridik som politik och om behovet av kritik. In P. Hall & L. Pelling (Eds.), Rätten till rättvisa: Om utsatta människors rättigheter och tillgång till rättvisa (pp. 60–75). Premiss Förlag.

4. Brown, W., & Halley, J. E. (2002). Left Legalism/Left Critique (E-Duke Books Scholarly Collection) [Electronic Resource]. Twentieth Century Literature.

5. Callahan, D. (1986). How Technology Is Reframing the Abortion Debate. Hastings Center Report, 16(1), 33–42.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Two Gender–Equal Nations? Anti-Gender Re-Configurations of National Belonging in Sweden and Spain;NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research;2024-07-15

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3