Exploring Swedish ‘Family Planning’: Reproductive Racism and Reproductive Justice

Author:

Mulinari Paula,Herz Marcus,Svensson Chowdhury Matilda

Abstract

AbstractIn Sweden, during the parliamentary election campaign in 2022, birth control and family planning were identified as practices that could solve all variety of social problems, from poverty to crime. They were also presented as a solution to migrant women’s supposed lack of integration into Swedish society.Criticism towards discourses and policies of family planning is extensive, from scholars challenging the notion of ‘voluntariness’ to those arguing that, in family planning, women’s lives are subordinated to economic and developmental goals. While contraceptive technologies hold an impressive emancipatory power in the lives of women globally, vulnerable groups of women have, in the name of family planning, experienced forced sterilisation and reproductive coercion.This chapter aims to analyse political discourses and governmental policies on reproduction through the conceptual lens of reproductive racism. We hope to challenge what we identify as historical amnesia concerning Swedish ‘family planning’ and show how, in different ways, reproductive rights in Sweden are inscribed and embedded into racial inequalities.The empirical material presented here has been collected with the aim of illustrating governmental policies that historically and today shape and frame diverse forms of reproductive racism with a special focus on welfare professionals.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference61 articles.

1. Aftonbladet. (2022, May 29). Man ska inte ha mer barn än vad man kan försörja [One Should Not Have More Children Than One Can Provide For]. Retrieved May 29, 2022, from https://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/a/jay5w9/eva-nordmark-skaffa-inte-fler-barn-an-du-kan-forsorja

2. Ahrnea, M., Schytt, E., Andersson, E., Small, R., Adana, A., Esséne, B., & Byrskog, U. (2019). Antenatal Care for Somali-Born Women in Sweden: Perspectives from Mothers, Fathers and Midwives. Midwifery, 74, 107–115.

3. Alinia, M. (2020). White Ignorance, Race, and Feminist Politics in Sweden. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 43(16), 249–267.

4. Axelsson, F, Tiroler, S., & Barfai, E. (2022, June). Vården måste försvara reproduktiva rättigher [Healthcare Must Defend Reproductive Rights]. Läkartidning. Retrieved May 29, 2022, from https://lakartidningen.se/opinion/debatt/2022/06/varden-maste-forsvara-reproduktiva-rattigheter

5. Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing Policy: What’s the Problem Represented to Be? Pearson Education.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3