Polish Stereotypes of the East: Old and New Mechanisms of Orientalisation in the Regional and Transnational Dimensions

Author:

Zarycki Tomasz

Abstract

AbstractThe chapter sets out to delineate a synthesising picture of the fundamental types and features of stereotypical images of “the East” in contemporary Polish identity discourses. They are analysed from a critical perspective in relation to postcolonial theory and the cultural/discursive problem of Orientalisation. The chapter also attempts to link the development mechanisms of stereotypical imaginaries of “the East” in contemporary Poland with so-called structural conditions, meaning dependencies of an economic and geopolitical kind. The Orientalism they engender, as the text sets out to prove, relates both to the countries neighbouring Poland, and to regions of eastern Poland which can be called the “internal Orient.” The author differentiates between two basic types of Orientalism, which he subsequently links with two ideological orientations: the conservative and the liberal. Conservative Orientalism is often branded as “classical,” and features the traditional Polish Eastern Borderlands (Kresy)as its dominant rhetorical figure. Liberal Orientalism characterised has less overt and less distinctive forms, and its manifestations are analysed using examples of new Borderlands discourses, which are often built in opposition to the traditional Eastern Borderlands stereotypes. The chapter also offers a comparative survey of reactions to Polish discourses of the East and analogical discursive mechanisms in the countries neighbouring Poland to the east.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference76 articles.

1. Babiński, Grzegorz. 1997. Pogranicze polsko-ukraińskie: etniczność, zróżnicowanie religijne, tożsamość. Kraków: Nomos.

2. Bakić-Hayden, Milica. 1995. Nesting orientalisms: The case of former Yugoslavia. Slavic Review 54: 917–931.

3. Bakuła, Bogusław. 2007. Colonial and postcolonial aspects of Polish discourse on Eastern Borderlands. In From sovietology to postcoloniality: Poland and Ukraine from a postcolonial perspective, ed. J. Korek, 41–57. Stockholm: Södertörns högskola.

4. Beauvois, Daniel. 1994. Mit ‘kresów wschodnich’ czyli jak mu położyć kres. In Polskie mity polityczne XIX i XX wieku, ed. W. Wrzesiński, 93–105. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.

5. Beauvois, Daniel. 2003. Pouvoir russe et noblesse polonaise en Ukraine: 1793–1830. Paris: CNRS.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3