Author:
Fritsch Michael,Greve Maria,Wyrwich Michael
Abstract
AbstractWe investigate how 40 years of a communist regime in East Germany and the subsequent German unification affected innovation activities. The empirical evidence suggests that the benefits of integrating the two innovation systems were much greater in the West than in the East, which has resulted in an increasing gap in innovation activities between the two regions. Innovation activity in East Germany was highly concentrated in a few hot spots that have a tradition of innovation reaching back to the time before the Second World War (WWII). The innovation activities that we observe in Germany today are strongly shaped not only by separation into a socialist and a capitalist part after WWII but also by the shock transformation over the course of rapid reunification, which has had lasting effects.
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Reference45 articles.
1. Augustine, D.L. (2007) Red Prometheus: Engineering and Dictatorship in East Germany, 1945–1990. Transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Agrawal A, Cockburn I (2003) The Anchor Tenant Hypothesis: Exploring the Role of Large, Local, R&D-intensive Firms in Regional Innovation Systems. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1227–53.
3. BBSR (2019) Arbeitsmarktregionen ab 2021. GeoBasis-DE/BKG. Available at: https://www.bmwk.de/Redaktion/DE/Downloads/A/arbeitsmarktregionen-ab-2021.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=4
4. Becker S O et al. (2020) The Separation and Reunification of Germany: Rethinking a Natural Experiment Interpretation of the Enduring Effects of Communism. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 34 (2), 143171. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.34.2.143
5. Berentsen W H (1981) Regional Change in the German Democratic Republic. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 71: 50–66