Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference107 articles.
1. Abdi AJ, Fieselmann A, Pfaff H, Mertelmeier T, Larsen LB (2018) Comparison of screening performance metrics and patient dose of two mammographic image acquisition modes in the Danish National Breast Cancer Screening Programme. Eur J Radiol 105(August):188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.06.010
2. Agasthya GA, D’Orsi CJ, Holbrook A, Ho C, Piraner M, Newell M, Gilliland L, Sechopoulos I (2016) Reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis interpretation time by slabbing of the reconstructed slices. In: European Congress of Radiology, Vienna, Austria
3. Agasthya GA, D’Orsi E, Kim Y-J, Handa P, Ho CP, D’Orsi CJ, Sechopoulos I (2017) Can breast compression be reduced in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis? Am J Roentgenol 209(5):W322–W332. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.17615
4. American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) (2018) AAPM position statement on radiation risks from medical imaging procedures. https://www.aapm.org/org/policies/details.asp?id=439&type=PP
5. Andersson I, Ikeda D, Zackrisson S, Ruschin M, Svahn T, Timberg P, Tingberg A (2008) Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings. Eur Radiol 18(12):2817–2825