1. Larin, S., Malkov, U.: Modern approaches to the modeling of tests: a system of requirements, advantages and disadvantages, the main stages of development. Int. J. World Sci. 4(#1) (2016). Available at:
http://mir-nauki.com/PDF/04PDMN116.pdf
2. Newman, I., Lim, J., Pineda F.: Content Validity using Mixed Methods Approach: Its application and development through the use of a Table of Specifications Methodology1 Paper presented at the 2011 Annual Meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Anaheim, California, Nov 2–5 (2011). Available at:
http://comm.eval.org/HigherLogic/System/DownloadDocumentFile.ashx?DocumentFileKey=30758c14-2e59-4c94-af88-ecdf11b0dabc
3. Chelyshkova, M.: Theory and practice of designing of pedagogical tests. p. 432, Published by Logos (2002). Available at:
http://booksshare.net/index.php?id1=4&category=pedagog&author=chelishkova-mb&book=2002
4. Kurtasov, A., Shvecov, A.: The method of automated generation of control-test tasks from the text of training materials. Bull. Cherepovets State Univ. (#7)7–13 (2014). Available at:
https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/metod-avtomatizirovannoy-generatsii-kontrolno-testovyh-zadaniy-iz-teksta-uchebnyh-materialov
5. Heilman, M., Smith, M.: Good question! statistical ranking for question generation. In: Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual Conference of NAACL. pp. 609–617, Los Angeles, California (2010). Available at:
http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N10-1086