Author:
Krulišová Kateřina,O’Sullivan Míla
Abstract
AbstractThis chapter maps contemporary debates in feminist security studies (FSS) in Europe, showing the variety of issues studied via different theoretical and methodological lenses. While celebrating the richness of contemporary FSS debates, the chapter also highlights the asymmetry in knowledge production across the continent. FSS is clearly dominated by academics based in globally recognized ‘Centers of Excellence’ in Western and Northern Europe; yet our mapping also highlights scholarship in Central, Eastern, Southern, and South-eastern Europe. This underscores some obstacles scholars outside of the ‘West’ face when engaging with the discipline and calls for more inclusive transnational FSS debate in Europe.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference126 articles.
1. Aavik, Kadri, and Raili Marling. “Gender studies at the time of neo-liberal transformation in Estonian academia.” In Kahlert, Heike, ed. Gender Studies and the New Academic Governance: Longstanding Patters and Emerging paradoxes, pp. 41–64. Weisbaden: Springer, 2018.
2. Acheson, Ray, and Maria Butler. “WPS and Arms Trade Treaty.” In Davies, Sara E., and Jacqui True, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Women, Peace, and Security. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190638276.013.52
3. Achilleos-Sarll, Columba. “Reconceptualising foreign policy as gendered, sexualised and racialised: Towards a postcolonial feminist foreign policy (analysis).” Journal of International Women’s Studies 19, no. 1 (2018): 34–49.
4. Aggestam, Karin, and Annika Bergman-Rosamond. “Swedish feminist foreign policy in the making: Ethics, politics, and gender.” Ethics & International Affairs 30, no. 3 (2016): 323–334.
5. Aggestam, Karin, Annika Bergman Rosamond, and Annica Kronsell. “Theorising feminist foreign policy.” International Relations 33, no. 1 (2019): 23–39.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献