Between Numbers and Political Drivers: What Matters in Policy-Making

Author:

Maggini Nicola

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter aims to investigate whether (restrictive) policy measures on migration across seven European countries (the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Italy, Switzerland and the UK) are better explained by political factors, rather than the actual number of migrants/refugees/asylum seekers, their integration process or the effective European societies’ demographic and economic needs, within each national context. The analysis shows, indeed, that restrictive legislative and policy measures on immigration and integration issues seem to be not justified by the reality of immigration in the selected European countries. Conversely, these restrictive measures can be explained by some relevant political factors: prevalence of negative attitudes towards immigration among European citizens and salience of the immigration issue; electoral relevance of populist radical-right parties who mostly mobilized on immigration issues and significant diffusion of their authoritarian/traditionalist/nationalist positions within each country’s party system. These data confirm that citizens’ perceptions and party systems’ features are closely related phenomena, which influence one another and are all key factors that need to be considered to explain the law and policy-making of recent years on immigration issues.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference57 articles.

1. Abou-Chadi, T. (2016). Political and institutional determinants of immigration policies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(13), 2087–2110.

2. Abou-Chadi, T., & Krause, W. (2018). The causal effect of radical right success on mainstream parties’ policy positions: A regression discontinuity approach. British Journal of Political Science, 50, 1–19.

3. Alesina, A., & Glaeser, E. (2004). Fighting poverty in the US and Europe: A world of difference. New York: Oxford University Press.

4. Banting, K. (2000). Looking in three directions: migration and the European welfare state in comparative perspective. In M. Bommes & A. Geddes (Eds.), Immigration and welfare: Challenging the borders of the welfare state (pp. 13–33). London: Routledge.

5. Bay, A.-H., Finseraas, H., & Pedersen, A. W. (2013). Welfare Dualism in two Scandinavian welfare states: Public opinion and party politics. West European Politics, 36(1), 199–220.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3