Abstract
AbstractThe internet as a technology not only revolutionized communication, it also enabled new forms of trade. Digital trade often involves personal data. Information about individuals now travels around the world on an unprecedented and rapidly growing scale. The key to understanding the implications of data protection in the EU for trade with the wider world is the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (Charter, CFR). The Charter has the status of primary Union law and data protection is enshrined as a fundamental right in Article 8 CFR. The first section of this chapter traces the development of the right to data protection from the early data protection laws in Europe to the inclusion of Article 8 into the Charter. It identifies the driving forces behind this development and offers insights into the origins of this new fundamental right (Sect. 2.1). The second section addresses the substance of the right to data protection. It explains the underlying values for the interpretation of the new fundamental right and analyzes the six written constituent parts of Article 8 CFR. It shows that the right to data protection must be distinguished from the right to private life in Article 7 CFR. The second section also explains what counts as an interference with the right to data protection and addresses lawful limitations on the exercise of this new fundamental right (Sect. 2.2). The third section focuses on the extraterritorial dimension of the right to data protection. The jurisprudence of the ECJ reveals an unwritten constituent part of the new fundamental right: the right to continuous protection of personal data. Personal data cannot be exported to third states that do not provide a level of protection for the transferred personal data that is essentially equivalent to that guaranteed within the EU (Sect. 2.3). Certain practices in third states are of particular relevance for the extraterritorial dimension of Article 8 CFR. Foreign internet surveillance often targets personal data that is transferred from the EU to a third country. The fourth section analyzes the requirements for foreign internet surveillance practices emanating from the right to data protection in Article 8 CFR (Sect. 2.4).
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference285 articles.
1. Abraham S (2017) Systematic government access to private-sector data in India. In: Cate FH, Dempsey JX (eds) Bulk collection. Systematic government access to private-sector data. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 257–286
2. Allen A (1988) Uneasy access: privacy for women in a free society. Rowman & Littlefield, Totowa
3. Baker J (2016) A clash of EU privacy standards. European countries could face charges of hypocrisy over data protection. Politico, 13 February 2016. https://www.politico.eu/article/chash-over-data-protection-standards-privacy-safe-harbor-europe/. Accessed 3 January 2021
4. Bartels L (2015) The EU’s human rights obligations in relation to policies with extraterritorial effects. Eur J Int Law 25(4):1071–1091
5. Bauman Z, Bigo D, Esteves P, Guild E, Jabri V, Lyon D, Walker RBJ (2014) After Snowden: rethinking the impact of surveillance. Int Political Sociol 8(2):121–144