Abstract
AbstractIn reaction to the stalemate in the multilateral trading system, international governance of digital trade has gradually shifted toward bilateral and regional trade agreements. This allowed countries to start to regulating cross-border flows of personal data outside the WTO framework. The first section of this chapter traces the development of data flow clauses in the trade agreements of the EU, the US, and other countries. It also looks at the negotiations of the big trade agreements in the late 2010s, such as the TTIP, the TiSA, and the TPP (Sect. 5.1). The second section outlines the scope for data flow clauses in the trade agreements of the EU based on different legal requirements stemming from the architecture of EU law, the GDPR, and other regulations. These requirements include the primacy of fundamental rights over international law with regard to the right to continuous protection of personal data in Article 8 CFR, the accommodation of the legal mechanisms for the transfer of personal data in the GDPR, the inclusion of cooperation mechanisms on the basis of Article 50 GDPR, and the ban of data localization requirements beyond data protection and privacy concerns. These legal requirements are necessary to consider when drafting data flow clauses for EU trade agreements (Sect. 5.2). The third section of this chapter offers and analyzes four potential designs for data flow clauses for EU trade agreements (Sect. 5.3). The fourth section is dedicated to the analysis of the EU model data flow clauses that the European Commission introduced as a template for future trade negotiations in 2018 (Sect. 5.4).
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference87 articles.
1. Aaronson SA (2015) Why Trade Agreements are not setting information free: the lost history and reinvigorated debate over cross-border data flows, human rights, and national security. World Trade Rev 14(4):671–700
2. Aaronson SA, Townes MD (2012) Can trade policy set information free? Trade agreements, internet governance and internet freedom. George Washington University Policy Brief. Washington DC
3. Barents R (2004) The autonomy of community law. Kluwer Law, The Hague
4. Barnard C, Peers S (2017) European Union law, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
5. Berka W (2017) CETA, TTIP, TiSA and data protection. In: Griller S, Obwexer W, Vranes E (eds) Mega-Regional Trade Agreements: CETA, TTIP, and TiSA: new orientations for EU external economic relations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 175–186