Constrained Humanitarian Space in Rohingya Response: Views from Bangladeshi NGOs

Author:

Khan Abdul Kadir

Abstract

AbstractIn Bangladesh, hundreds of thousands of Rohingyas have been seeking viable solutions to the plight of their displacement from Myanmar since August 2017. Today, they rely entirely on humanitarian aid and material services. Considering the notion of humanitarian space as an arena of social negotiations between multiple humanitarian actors over their access to the affected communities, this chapter captures the views of twenty Bangladeshi NGOs and identifies three main characteristics in the constrained humanitarian space of the Rohingya response: (a) discrepancies in localization discourses; (b) institutional multiplicity; and (c) disparities in accountability mechanisms. The study concludes that, despite the constant calls of Bangladeshi NGOs for locally led aid initiatives, they are largely side-lined in terms of the Rohingya humanitarian response. Moreover, institutional multiplicity as a form of parallel governance by the Government of Bangladesh and international humanitarian stakeholders often leads to collective action dilemmas and disparities in accountability mechanisms.

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference42 articles.

1. Abild, E. (2010). Creating humanitarian space: A case study of Somalia. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 29(3), 67–102. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdq030

2. Acharya, A. (2004). How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization, 58(2), 239–275.

3. ADSP. (2020, October). Rohingya in South East Asia: Opportunities for engagement. Asia Displacement Solutions Platform. Retrieved February 1, 2022, from https://adsp.ngo/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/ADSP_2020_ROHINGYA-IN-SOUTHEAST-ASIA_V1.pdf

4. Alam, M. F. (2021). Role of civil society and NGOs in the Rohingya refugee crisis in Bangladesh: An overview. In S. K. Behera & G. S. Nag (Eds.), The Rohingya crisis mapping the conundrum and challenges of peace building: Selective South Asian perspectives (1st ed., pp. 70–84). Lulu Publication.

5. Banks, N., & Bukenya, B. (2022). Northern and Southern non-governmental organizations. In K. Sims, N. Banks, S. Engel, P. Hodge, J. Makuwira, N. Nakamura, J. Rigg, A. Salamanca & P. Yeophantong (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of global development (1st ed., pp. 106–118). Routledge

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3