1. Akbar, M.A., et al.: Improving the quality of software development process by introducing a new methodology-AZ-model. IEEE Access 6, 4811–4823 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2787981
2. Alshayeb, M., Shaaban, Y., AlGhamdi, J.: SPMDL: software product metrics definition language. J. Data Inf. Qual. 9(4), 20:1–20:30 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1145/3185049
3. Bagnato, A., da Silva, M.A.A., Abherve, A., Rocheteau, J., Pihery, C., Mabit, P.: Measuring green software engineering in the MEASURE ITEA 3 project. In: Condori-Fernández, N., Procaccianti, G., Calero, C., Bagnato, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Measurement and Metrics for Green and Sustainable Software Systems, MeGSuS 2016, Co-Located with 10th International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2016), Ciudad Real, Spain, 7 September 2016. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1708, pp. 33–42. CEUR-WS.org (2016).
http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1708/paper-06.pdf
4. Bouwers, E., van Deursen, A., Visser, J.: Evaluating usefulness of software metrics: an industrial experience report. In: Notkin, D., Cheng, B.H.C., Pohl, K. (eds.) 35th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2013, San Francisco, CA, USA, 18–26 May 2013, pp. 921–930. IEEE Computer Society (2013).
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE.2013.6606641
5. Carvallo, J.P., Franch, X.: Extending the ISO/IEC 9126-1 quality model with non-technical factors for cots components selection. In: Proceedings of the 2006 International Workshop on Software Quality, WoSQ 2006, pp. 9–14. ACM, New York (2006).
https://doi.org/10.1145/1137702.1137706
.
http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1137702.1137706