Author:
Horn Christian,Peternell Mark,Ling Johan,Green Ashely,Potter Rich
Abstract
AbstractMethods to document rock art in all three dimensions have become a standardized workflow. In this article, we discuss their advantages and disadvantages when compared to older reductive approaches to rock art documentation. Furthermore, some misunderstandings regarding 3D documentation are addressed. As the majority of the problems presented by the 3D documentation of rock art can be solved through advanced visualization workflows, recent developments in this area are described. The rock art documentation described in this contribution also serves wider research purposes, which will be discussed. Newly discovered images and newly developed machine learning algorithms will also be introduced.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference56 articles.
1. Ahlqvist L, Vandkilde H (2018) Hybrid beasts of the Nordic Bronze Age. Dan J Archaeol 7:180–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/21662282.2018.1507704
2. Alexander C, Pinz A, Reinbacher C (2015) Multi-scale 3D rock-art recording. Digit Appl Archaeol Cultural Herit 2:181–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2015.02.003
3. Serie C, Arkeologiskaskrifter, vol 51;L Bengtsson,2004
4. Bennett R, Welham K, Hill RA, Ford A (2011) Making the most of airborne remote sensing techniques for archaeological survey and interpretation. In: Cowley D (ed) Remote sensing for archaeological heritage management: proceedings of the 11th EAC heritage management symposium, Reykjavík, Iceland, 25–27 march 2010 / edited by David C. Cowley. EAC, Brussel, pp 99–106
5. Berry D (2011) The computational turn: thinking about the digital humanities. Cult Mach 12