Conceptualising the Multi-actorness of EU(ropean) Foreign and Security Policy

Author:

Rieker Pernille,Giske Mathilde T. E.

Abstract

AbstractThis chapter seeks to conceptualise the multi-actor character of what we refer to here as EU(ropean) foreign and security policy. It takes a holistic approach to European foreign and security policy—a policy that covers multiple areas and is carried out by a multitude of actors and institutions. While the framework builds on institutional approaches, such as the literatures on multi-level governance and Differentiated Integration (DI), it adds a new dimension by applying a somewhat broader definition of European integration—a definition that captures more than just the processes that occur within the EU. Applying a broader approach towards European integration allows us to continue to perceive the EU as central to the European integration process, while also allowing for the inclusion of other processes that in some ways, either formally or informally, are linked to the EU. We argue that such a framework better captures the dynamics of today’s increasingly complex EU(ropean) integration process, characterised by opt-outs and opt-ins, formal and informal processes, enhanced cooperation, and various forms of governance led by actors at different levels and with different types of relations to the EU. As we will show in this chapter, a more generic definition of integration helps us develop a framework that captures this complexity and sees clearly the different roles EU institutions play in the various policy areas. The intention is to present a more inclusive conceptual framework that fills two key gaps in the existing literature on European integration in this area.

Publisher

Springer Nature Switzerland

Reference70 articles.

1. Adler, R., & Svendsen, Ø. (2019). Differentiated (dis)integration in practice: The diplomacy of Brexit and the low politics of high politics. Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(6), 1419–1430. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12960

2. Ansell, C. (2021). Institutionalism. In M. Riddervold, J. Trondal, & A. Newsome (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of EU crises (pp. 135–152). Palgrave Macmillan.

3. Ansell, C., Trondal, J., & Øgård, M. (Eds.). (2017). Governance in turbulent times. Oxford University Press.

4. Benz, A. (2012). The European Union as a loosely coupled multilevel system. In H. Enderlein, S. Wälti, & M. Zürn (Eds.), Handbook on multilevel governance (pp. 214–226). Edward Elgar.

5. Billon-Galland, A., & Whitman, R. G. (2021, April 28). Towards a strategic agenda for the E3: Opportunities and risks for France, Germany and the UK [Chatham House Research Paper]. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2021/04/towards-strategic-agenda-e3/further-e3-cooperation-what-and-what

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3