Challenges of Global Technology Assessment in Biotechnology—Bringing Clarity and Better Understanding in Fragmented Global Governance

Author:

van Baalen SophieORCID,Srinivas Krishna Ravi,He GuangxiORCID

Abstract

AbstractBiotechnology involves the use and manipulation of living organisms such as plants, animals, humans, and biological systems, or parts of this, to modify their characteristics in order to create desired organisms or products. Biotechnology as a field touches on many aspects that are central to technology assessment (TA), and have been the focus of TA activities since the 1980s. By presenting three key topics in biotechnology—genetically modified food and crops, synthetic biology, and human genome germline editing—we show that a central feature of biotechnology is that the science is evolving globally and the products that it brings forth are traded across the globe. Yet, there are major differences in the regulation and governance of the academic and industrial sectors between countries. These stem from different needs and interests per country, as well as differences in traditions, cultural differences and public perceptions. As global governance is fragmented, with little scope for harmonization, global TA of biotechnology can bring clarity and better understanding, and enable better governance. In order to do so, an integrated global TA framework should consider international trade and differences in risk assessment; cultural variation and different value-systems between countries; and differences in countries’ capacities in R&D and coordination of public engagement efforts.

Funder

Fraunhofer-Institut für System- und Innovationsforschung

Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften

Rathenau Instituut

Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

Publisher

Springer International Publishing

Reference83 articles.

1. BAS. (2008). Social consequences of biotechnology in agriculture. Bureau of Research/Biuro Analiz Sejmowych of the Polish Parliament (the Sejm) (BAS).

2. Beekman, V., De Bakker, E., Baranzke, H., Baune, O., Deblonde, M., Forsberg, E.-M., De Graaff, R., Ingensiep, H.-W., Lassen, J., Mepham, B., Porsborg Nielsen, A., Tomkins, S., Thorstensen, E., Millar, K., Skorupinski, B., Brom, F., Kaiser, M., & Sandoe, P. (2006). Ethical bio-technology assessment tools for agriculture and food production. Final Report Ethical Bio-TA Tools. (QLG6-CT-2002-02594). LEI.

3. Berg, P. (2008). Asilomar 1975: DNA modification secured. Nature, 455, 290–291.

4. Briggle, A. l. (2005). Asilomar conference. In C. Mitcham (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science, technology and ethics (pp. 118–121). Thomson/Gale.

5. Bull, A. T., Holt, G., & Lilly, M. (1982). Biotechnology—International trends and perspectives. OECD.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3