Abstract
AbstractIt has become increasingly mainstream to argue that redressing the Eurocentrism of migration studies requires a commitment to decentring Global North knowledge. However, it is less clear whether this necessarily means “recentering the South.” Against this backdrop, this chapter starts by highlighting diverse ways that scholars have sought to redress Eurocentrism in migration studies: (1) examining the applicability of classical concepts and frameworks in the South; (2) filling blind spots by studying migration in the South and South–South migration; and (3) engaging critically with the geopolitics of knowledge production. The remainder of the chapter examines questions on decentring and recentring, different ways of conceptualising the South, and—as a pressing concern with regard to knowledge production—the politics of citation. In so doing, the chapter critically delineates the contours of these debates and sets out a number of key priorities for researchers moving forward.
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference110 articles.
1. Achiume, E. T. (2019). Migration as decolonisation. Stanford Law Review, 71(6), 1509–1574.
2. Adamson, F. B., & Tsourapas, G. (2019). The migration state in the Global South: Nationalizing, developmental, and neoliberal models of migration management. International Migration Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918319879057
3. Álvarez Velasco, S. (2020). From Ecuador to Elsewhere: The (re)configuration of a transit country. Migration and Society, 3, 34–49.
4. Amin, S. (1972a). Neocolonialism in West Africa. Penguin.
5. Amin, S. (1972b). Underdevelopment and dependence in Black Africa: Origins and contemporary forms. Journal of Modern African Studies, 10(4), 503–524.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献