Author:
Lashkevich Katsiaryna,Mediavilla Ponce Lino Moises,Camargo Manuel,Milani Fredrik,Dumas Marlon
Abstract
AbstractOverprocessing is a source of waste that occurs when unnecessary work is performed in a process. Overprocessing is often found in application-to-approval processes since a rejected application does not add value, and thus, work that leads to the rejection constitutes overprocessing. Analyzing how the knock-out checks are executed can help analysts to identify opportunities to reduce overprocessing waste and time. This paper proposes an interpretable process mining approach for discovering improvement opportunities in the knock-out checks and recommending redesigns to address them. Experiments on synthetic and real-life event logs show that the approach successfully identifies improvement opportunities while attaining a performance comparable to black-box approaches. Moreover, by leveraging interpretable machine learning techniques, our approach provides further insights on knock-out check executions, explaining to analysts the logic behind the suggested redesigns. The approach is implemented as a software tool and its applicability is demonstrated on a real-life process.
Publisher
Springer Nature Switzerland
Reference24 articles.
1. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process Mining: Data Science in Action, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49851-4
2. van der Aalst, W.M.: Re-engineering knock-out processes. Decis. Support Syst. 30(4), 451–468 (2001)
3. Buijs, J.: 3TU. DC dataset: receipt phase of an environmental permit application process (WABO) (2015)
4. Chahal, V., Narwal, M.: Impact of lean strategies on different industrial lean wastes. Int. J. Theor. Appli. Mech. 12(2), 275–286 (2017)
5. Cohen, W.W.: Fast effective rule induction. In: Machine Learning Proceedings 1995, pp. 115–123. Elsevier (1995)
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献