Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Reference28 articles.
1. Logé D, De Coster O, Washburn S. Technological innovation in spinal cord stimulation: use of a newly developed delivery device for introduction of spinal cord stimulation leads. Neuromodulation. 2012;15(4):392–401.
2. Mironer E, Bernstein CA, Mason R, et al. A prospective clinical evaluation of a rechargeable implantable pulse generator (IPG) in combination with a tripolar lead array: final analysis of sustainability of spinal cord stimulation therapy for chronic lower back pain. Poster presented at: 2011 bi-annual meeting of the international Neuromodulation society. London, England; May 25, 2011.
3. Barolat G, Oakley JC, Law JD, North RB, Ketcik B, Sharan A. Epidural spinal cord stimulation with a multiple electrode paddle lead is effective in treating intractable low back pain. Neuromodulation. 2001;4:59–66.
4. North RB, Kidd DH, Petrucci L, Dorsi MJ. Spinal cord stimulation electrode design: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing percutaneous with laminectomy electrodes: part II—clinical outcomes. Neurosurgery. 2005;57:990–6. discussion 990–996.
5. Villavicencio AT, Leveque JC, Rubin L, Bulsara K, Gorecki JP. Laminectomy versus percutaneous electrode placement for spinal cord stimulation. Neurosurgery. 2000;46:399–405. discussion 405–406.